Not a linear chatbot. Collaborate with AI agents to think, create, and curate ideas.

No signup — you land in a live example, already mid-thought.
See how it works ↓
✦
The idea behind Think

Thinking was never a straight line.

Watch how a real idea arrives. It doesn't march in as a tidy sequence of steps. You circle a question, contradict yourself, drop a thread and pick it up two days later. You chase a tangent that turns out to be the whole point. The natural shape of thought is a map — branches, loops, and dead ends worth keeping — not a line.

Yet almost every AI tool pours your thinking into a single scrolling chat. Each follow-up narrows the road. The promising idea from twenty messages ago quietly sinks out of view, and going back to explore it means abandoning everything you've written since. So you never do — and the deeper version of the thought never happens.

✦Chat flattens thought.
We built a place that lets it keep its shape.
A chat — one line
ideas sink, never to return
Your mind — a map
every path stays alive
01
A canvas for thought

So the conversation became a canvas.

In Think, a collaboration isn't a feed — it's a space. Any reply can branch into a new direction while the original line keeps going beside it. Chase three approaches at once. Pin a sticky note next to the argument it belongs to. Open a small thread for a side-question without derailing the main line. When a cluster starts meaning something, draw a section around it and name it; stamp a ✓ or a ★ on the cards that earn one.

Nothing sinks. Come back a week later and the whole shape of your thinking is still there — every branch exactly where you left it, ready to continue.

Pilot this for a month ✦
↳ thread · 2 replies
✓ 2
Branch any reply · drop notes anywhere · sections and stamps mark what matters.
02
Thinking in pictures

When words run out, it draws.

Some thoughts refuse to stay in sentences. Ask for the funnel, the tradeoff chart, the first sketch of a screen — and your agents answer with real figures, rendered live inside the reply. Not descriptions of a chart. The chart.

The good ones don't stay buried in chat. Grab any figure by its title bar and pin it to the canvas — it stays tethered to the conversation that made it, so every piece of evidence keeps its receipts. Drop your own images straight onto the board. And the chart that decides everything? Size it as big as it deserves.

Made in chat · pinned where it argues · tethered to its source.
03
Agents

Deep thinking, with partners.

In Think you build agents — thinking partners with a personality, skills, and a point of view you shape yourself. A blunt critic. A careful researcher. A strategist who always asks what winning looks like. A thought only sharpens when other minds push, probe, and build on it — and these are yours to assemble.

Tag any of them into a conversation with an @ and they don't just answer you — they answer each other. You put a half-formed hunch into words, they stress-test it from different angles, and the version of the idea you actually believe comes out the other side. That's the extraction: your best thinking, drawn out of you.

And they argue from your shelf, not just their training: hand an agent your PDFs — the market report, the research notes, the offer letter — and it grounds its answers in them, citing each document by name.

You Should we move the team to a four-day work week? @Rio @Max
Rio Viable — if you measure outcomes, not hours. The unlock is cutting low-value meetings.
Max Client coverage on Fridays is where most trials quietly fail. Who answers the phone?
↳ in a side-thread
You Fair — @Ada any data on coverage?
Ada Iceland's trials kept coverage with staggered schedules. No productivity drop. 📄 iceland-trials.pdf
Agents you shaped, thinking with you — and against you.
04
Thinking with your people

People belong on the canvas, too.

Agents sharpen an idea, but some answers live only in other people — the cofounder, the ops lead, the friend who has watched this exact plan fail before. So any collaboration can be shared: send an invite and they step into the same living map, not a screenshot of it. Cursors move in real time, branches grow side by side, and every idea is signed by the mind it came from.

And your agents know when it's not their turn. In a shared room, people talk to people — an agent joins only when someone summons it with an @, and then it thinks with everyone at once. Need eyes on the map without edits? Send a read-only link instead.

A room rarely meets at the same hour — so judgment travels as stamps. Sweep the board and mark ✓ agree, ✗ risky, ★ this one; the tallies gather while you sleep, and the wiki reads them when it distills. Async isn't a compromise here. It's the design.

Four-day work week
live
Sam Ops here — Friday really is our heaviest day. But I could run two half-team rotations.
You That answers the coverage worry. @Max what breaks first?
Max✦ agent The handoff between rotations. Decide who owns an open ticket at 1pm.
Sam is replying…
Live cursors · stamps tally the room's judgment · agents wait for the @.
05
From exploration to knowledge

Then the thinking becomes knowledge.

Exploring is gloriously messy — that's the point of it. But a month later, a sprawling map of branches isn't something you can re-read. So when a collaboration reaches something worth keeping, Think distills it: the branches, the debates, the decisions and the open questions compile into a clean, Wikipedia-style article in your personal knowledge wiki.

You stay the curator. Keep the articles that matter, skip the scratch work — so the wiki stays signal: a real record of what you think, and why you think it.

the exploration
Four-Day Work Week
From your knowledge wiki
◆ Decisions
  • Viable when measured on outcomes, not hours.
  • Needs staggered Friday coverage for support.
◆ Open questions
  • Exact rotation mechanics for coverage.
One messy, branching conversation → one clean article you never had to write.
06
The loop

And knowledge builds on knowledge.

The wiki isn't a drawer you file things into — it feeds back. New collaborations are grounded in the articles you've kept: agents read them, cite them, and stop asking you to re-explain your own context. Decisions stay traceable to the conversation that made them.

Think also studies the library as a whole and surfaces what you can't see up close — a combination of two ideas, a contradiction between decisions, a gap nobody has explored. Each one is a doorway into the next collaboration. Think, distill, build on it: every loop starts from higher ground.

✦ Ideas to explore
⚡ Combine pricing + four-day week → a premium tier
⚠ Your hiring plan conflicts with the budget cap
? No churn plan anywhere in the wiki yet
Your thinking compounds instead of scattering.
✦

Think in branches. Keep what matters.
Build on it.

Your canvas, your agents, your people — and a library of your own best thinking.

No signup — you land in a live example.